Just as no chess player will ever live long enough to exhaust all the combinations of possible moves for the thirty-two pieces on the chessboard, so we know (given the fact that our minds are chessboards with hundreds of billions of pieces) that not even in a lifetime lasting as long as the universe would one ever manage to make all possible plays.
The Uses of Literature: Essays. San Diego: Harcourt, 1982. Italo Calvino, Cybernetics and Ghosts (20,22): The relationship between combinatorial play and the unconscious in artistic activity lies at the heart of one of the most convincing aesthetic theories currently in circulation, a formula that draws upon both psychoanalysis and the practical experience of arts and letters. Literature isShannon, Weiner, von Neumann, and Turing have radically altered our image of our mental processes.
The case of Italo Calvino, who died in September 1985 at the age of sixty-two, is also sad, but for different reasons. A few copies may still be found in libraries or ordered through the Amazon bookshop.Literary remains are sad affairs, usually because they are remains: embers, litter, scrapings of already well-scraped barrels. The original version has been out of print for many years. Principia Cybernetica has selected Ashbys 'Introduction to Cybernetics' as a classic book that deserved to be published again electronically. Cybernetics and ghosts Two interviews on science and literature Philosophy and literature Literature as projection of desire Definitions of territories: comedy Definitions of territories: eroticism Definitions of territories: fantasy Cinema and the novel: problems of narrative, whom do we write for, or the. English Subjects: Literature.
'Cybernetics and Ghosts.' The Uses of Literature: Essays. In this example, what are the page numbers for the book chapter it representsCalvino, Italo. The text simultaneously explains the ways in which knowledge is being reordered in response to recent developments in cybernetic and information theories. They also suggest a different, more confessional Calvino, another writer who has scarcely been born.Italo Calvino's Cybernetics and Ghosts (1967) stands at the crossroads between cybernetics as a proposed new epistemology and cybernetics as a mode of literary and self-reflexive production.
Memorandum: to be remembered. The memo is a short hop to a long view, and its office-world resonances lightly deride the writer’s millennial ambitions. He was “delighted,” his widow says, with the word “memos,” having tried and rejected “Some Literary Values,” “A Choice of Literary Values,” “Six Literary Legacies,” and so on. Print.Six Memos for the Next Millennium contains five of the six Charles Eliot Norton Lectures Calvino was to have given at Harvard the absent lecture/memo literally representing the space of his death, since he died before he was able to complete it or give the lectures.
“I hope to have shown,” he says, “that there is such a thing as a lightness of thoughtfulness, just as we all know that there is a lightness of frivolity. “His novel…is in reality a bitter confirmation of the Ineluctable Weight of Living.” Calvino’s lightness is a grace of the intelligence, a marvelous agility among the tombs. Not the unbearable lightness that haunts the characters of Milan Kundera-this, as Calvino suggests, is a complicated form of heaviness, a quite different sort of virtue. All of his named virtues are important, but lightness dominates. He also reflects on his own work (“The book in which I think I managed to say most remains Invisible Cities“), and he is not too worried if his five (or six) categories keep crossing over and mingling. I believe that he may be the Lucretius of our time, reconstructing the physical nature of the world by means of the impalpable, powder-fine dust of words”), Georges Perec (whose La vie mode d’emploi, 1978, is in Calvino’s view “the last real ‘event’ in the history of the novel”).
“A general explanation of the world and of history,” he grandly says in The Road to San Giovanni, and we are hesitating already. He revolves them in his mind and in his prose, so that we see both what they are and that they are not all there is. He doesn’t make them look lighter either. He doesn’t confirm their weight, as Kundera does, and he doesn’t evade them, like more writers than we care to think of.
Italo Calvino Cybernetics And Ghosts Movie Houses And
My edition says the contrivance serves to let the world know if it exits, which is also a nice idea, but not quite the same thing.A world: what belongs to us, our habitat, mental or physical what’s out there, beyond the mind and the self, the profusion of things we haven’t dreamed or invented other people an order, a coherence, a realm, or a shape drawn on the face of chaos. “As I saw it, the world, the map of the planet, began on the other side of our house and went downwards….” The last words of the book evoke a conscious self that exists only so that “the world may continually receive news of the existence of the world, a contrivance at the service of the world for knowing if it exists,” per sapere se c’è. Calvino writes of the “time when the cinema became the world for me,” that is, when what he saw on the screen “possessed the properties required of a world, the fullness, the necessity, the coherence.” He and his father have different worlds: the father’s beginning uphill from the family house in San Remo, taking in forest and country, flowers, game, farms Calvino’s starting downhill, in the town where the movie houses and the beaches are. In Prima che tu dica ‘Pronto’ there is a story called “The memory of the world,” in which a sinister organization is registering everything that has been or will be known: tyranny, a way of ruling the whole world, all possible worlds.The word occurs again and again in The Road to San Giovanni. Calvino likes the word world, mondo, but partly for its affectations. We recognize the mild self-mockery and the quiet claim for the specific, the miming and undoing of generality.
‘What am I saying?’ he added. “One day in the spring of 1985, Calvino told me he was going to write twelve more books. The other engaging and distressing note in her foreword is the echo we hear of Calvino’s cheerful voice. Since a number of the projected passages are missing, Esther Calvino wittily says, she felt she couldn’t use this title. Calvino’s working title for the book these pieces might have made was Passaggi obbligati, necessary or grateful passages, with several meanings of passage in play. A world: most of us are lucky if we have a street or a block or a patch of garden where we know our way around if we know where our house is situated.The Road to San Giovanni brings together five pieces written between 19 and published separately in Italy then.
Myrna Loy, Jean Harlow,Greta Garbo, Clark Gable, Gary Cooper, Franchot Tone were examples of how far you could get from where you were, models of an escape which was not simply an evasion but a measure of what another world might be like. This is an essay, he says, “presenting the cinema as another dimension of the world.” This is chiefly a dimension of distance, from Italy but also perhaps from any knowable historical reality. The second piece, “A Cinema-Goer’s Autobiography,” evokes the passion with which Calvino himself took in the American movies of the 1920s and 1930s.
This is the weakest of the five “passages” and it’s worth pausing to ask why. The writing is entirely charming, but has to work a little hard for its large meanings (“Only by throwing something away can I be sure that something of myself has not yet been thrown away and perhaps need not be thrown away now or in the future”). But he has forgotten more than he thinks, and what he remembers is what he saw, and still sees, only in his mind.The fourth piece is a whimsical essay on taking the garbage out in Paris, a “mythology” in the manner of Roland Barthes. Calvino concludes by suggesting that what he imagined at the time is in many ways more real than what he experienced, because he remembers now most vividly what he only imagined then, the dead body of their leader, “this dead man who instead of being the best of theirs had become the best of ours.” “It’s not true that I’ve forgotten everything,” he says.
What Barthes sought, Calvino himself said at the time of Barthes’s death, was an understanding of uniqueness through generalization his own method, although he doesn’t say this, is more or less the opposite. Barthes’s strength is flight, Calvino’s is lightness over the ground. Or is it because Calvino is a writer of fiction and Barthes isn’t, except in a rather attenuated sense? Barthes merely glances at the concrete, Calvino has an attentive loyalty to it it won’t let him go. They order these things differently in Italy: “It’s as if something basically wrong were revealing itself in our relationship with our rubbish, some profound defect in the Italian mind.” But Calvino is unable to play with philosophy the way Barthes can, can’t indulge it and overturn it and set it up again, and this may be a cultural rather than a personal matter, Italian as against French.
0 kommentar(er)
